Put the strings in the same getter. It makes no difference and is cleaner
This commit is contained in:
		| @@ -47,13 +47,11 @@ public class LibsDisguises extends JavaPlugin { | ||||
|         File configFile = new File(getDataFolder(), "config.yml"); | ||||
|         InputStream stream = null; | ||||
|         FileReader reader = null; | ||||
|         String toWrite = ""; | ||||
|         String toRead = ""; | ||||
|         try { | ||||
|             stream = getClassLoader().getResource("config.yml").openStream(); | ||||
|             toWrite = read(new InputStreamReader(stream)); | ||||
|             String toWrite = read(new InputStreamReader(stream)); | ||||
|             reader = new FileReader(configFile); | ||||
|             toRead = read(reader); | ||||
|             String toRead = read(reader); | ||||
|  | ||||
|             if (!toRead.equals(toWrite)) { | ||||
|                 try { | ||||
| @@ -92,7 +90,7 @@ public class LibsDisguises extends JavaPlugin { | ||||
|  | ||||
|         try { | ||||
|             // Here I use reflection to set the plugin for Disguise.. | ||||
|             // Kind of stupid but I don't want open API calls for a commonly used object. | ||||
|             // Kind of stupid but I don't want open API calls for a commonly used class. | ||||
|             Field field = Disguise.class.getDeclaredField("plugin"); | ||||
|             field.setAccessible(true); | ||||
|             field.set(null, this); | ||||
|   | ||||
		Reference in New Issue
	
	Block a user